Prince Harry’s recent efforts to cast his father, King Charles, in a negative light have been criticized by royal commentator Jennie Bond.
According to Bond, the Duke of Sussex attempted to garner sympathy during his recent visit to the UK by claiming he had nowhere to stay due to security concerns.
However, Bond disclosed that Prince Harry was indeed offered accommodation at various royal residences, including St James’s Palace, Clarence House, and Buckingham Palace, all of which he declined. She questioned the legitimacy of Harry’s security worries, emphasizing that royal residences are among the most secure locations, equipped with multiple entry and exit points to ensure the safety of the royal family.
“It smacks of seeking sympathy,” Bond remarked. “The ‘poor me’ attitude, claiming he has nowhere to stay, and his family won’t put him up, is unbecoming of a prince.”
The royal expert’s comments follow Prince Harry’s decision to stay in a private hotel rather than a royal residence during his UK trip, a move perceived as a deliberate snub to the royal family. Bond’s assertions suggest that Prince Harry’s attempt to portray himself as a victim may have backfired.
This development underscores the persistent tensions between Prince Harry and the royal family, highlighting how his attempts to solicit public sympathy might not be achieving the desired effect. The story reflects the ongoing rift within the royal household and suggests that Prince Harry’s narrative may not resonate as he intended.
Prince Harry’s attempt to defame King Charles backfires
Prince Harry’s recent efforts to cast his father, King Charles, in a negative light have been criticized by royal commentator Jennie Bond.
According to Bond, the Duke of Sussex attempted to garner sympathy during his recent visit to the UK by claiming he had nowhere to stay due to security concerns.
However, Bond disclosed that Prince Harry was indeed offered accommodation at various royal residences, including St James’s Palace, Clarence House, and Buckingham Palace, all of which he declined. She questioned the legitimacy of Harry’s security worries, emphasizing that royal residences are among the most secure locations, equipped with multiple entry and exit points to ensure the safety of the royal family.
“It smacks of seeking sympathy,” Bond remarked. “The ‘poor me’ attitude, claiming he has nowhere to stay, and his family won’t put him up, is unbecoming of a prince.”
The royal expert’s comments follow Prince Harry’s decision to stay in a private hotel rather than a royal residence during his UK trip, a move perceived as a deliberate snub to the royal family. Bond’s assertions suggest that Prince Harry’s attempt to portray himself as a victim may have backfired.
This development underscores the persistent tensions between Prince Harry and the royal family, highlighting how his attempts to solicit public sympathy might not be achieving the desired effect. The story reflects the ongoing rift within the royal household and suggests that Prince Harry’s narrative may not resonate as he intended.